skip to content

109 - Providing Private Instruction (Learning Pods)

109 - Providing Private Instruction (Learning Pods)

Introduction

The COVID 19 pandemic has created a number of challenges as plans are developed to reopen

schools for the 2020 21 school year. As a result of these challenges, some families are

contemplating alternative education programs for their children including what is known as a

“learning pod.” This bulletin offers some considerations for members who may be approached by

parents, guardians, or other organizations to lead a learning pod and/or to provide private instruction

to students during the COVID 19 pandemic.


What Are Learning Pods? 

Generally, learning pods are made up of an educator and a group of students. The educator

provides instruction to students independent of the students’ school. This instruction follows a

delivery model that may be face to face (at a private residence or site), online (featuring

synchronous and/or asynchronous instruction) or a combination of both. Instruction could be

provided during the typical hours of an instructional day, outside of those hours or a combination of

both.


Confidentiality and Professionalism 

Members should be extremely cautious about agreeing to provide instruction under such

arrangements as there are numerous risks. Members are reminded of their professional obligations

to maintain confidentiality as it relates to student information. As employees of school boards,

members should be familiar with policies and procedures concerning privacy and the accessing and

sharing of student information. Be careful about assisting parents to identify who might join such a

pod. Members must also be cautious about s haring student information without having the

appropriate consent.


Members should also exercise caution about communicating any criticisms related to their school

board’s reopening plans, whether done through direct contact with parents, guardians, or out side

organizations or through the use of social media platforms. School boards that become aware of

comments made by their employees that are deemed to be unprofessional or inconsistent with board

expectations of an employee may impose discipline and report to the Ontario College of Teachers

(OCT) or the College of Early Childhood Educators (CECE). Parents or guardians who express

concerns about the school board’s reopening plan and how this plan evolves should be directed to

the school administrator.


Potential Risks 

There are many risks members should assess prior to accepting this type of employment. Be aware that members who are providing instruction through learning pods or tutoring do so at their own risk and may not be eligible for ETFO support should problems arise as a result of providing private instruction.


Teaching in a learning pod is not covered by a formal employment agreement such as a collective agreement. Members who accept an informal relationship may not also have the protections provided by other forms of employment legislation. This leaves the member vulnerable.


Teaching in a learning pod, whether synchronous or not, and whether during normal

instructional time or not, is still governed by the OCT. All of your professional obligations

continue to apply and the OCT will investigate any complaints made in connection with this

work. ETFO would not provide legal assistance to members investigated by the OCT for

investigations that arise from their work instructing a learning pod.


Additionally, ETFO would not provide legal assistance for allegations involving the Children’s

Aid Society CAS or the police while teaching in a learning pod.


Members should make themselves aware of any relevant board policy, including policies on

tutoring and/or providing private instruction. Some boards may also develop policies

specifically addressing learning pods.


Members should be aware of any board policies or guidelines concerning conflict of interest.

Teachers are bound by the Professional Misconduct Regulation 437/97 under the Ontario

College of Teachers Act. Section 26 states that a teacher is guilty of professional misconduct

when practicing the profession while in a conflict of interest. As public servants, members are

held to higher standards than other employees in conflict of interest situations. Operating or

teaching within a learning pod that involves students assigned to you by your board is likely to

raise conflict of interest issues.


It would be inappropriate for members to advertise private instruction through connections at

the school, through school or board publications or the board’s computer network. Using any

board property, such as classroom or library materials or as a means of media transmission, in

the course of providing private instruction will be considered a conflict of interest. Directly or

indirectly promoting or selling any book or other teaching materials, equipment, or other items

to any pupil of your board (even if you are on leave) for compensation is a breach of the

Education Act There are only limited exceptions to this.


Members cannot be employed in any other capacity during times when they would otherwise

be expected to be at work, regardless of whether their board assignment is at a school or

offsite. Working a second job during your hours of work for the board would likely lead to

termination of y our board employment and a College complaint.


Members on a board approved medical leave should not accept other employment as a

teacher or as a designated early childhood educator while on leave. A member who is found to

be engaged in paid work while on sick leave could jeopardize their ongoing access to sick

leave and risk being accused of fraudulent use of sick leave. Engaging in teaching duties even

on a volunteer basis during a sick leave can risk ongoing access to sick leave and allegations

of fraud. Fraudulent sick leave claims often result in termination of employment and a report to

the College.


Members who access a leave of absence ( from their school board to pursue other

employment opportunities should be aware of their local collective agreement language that

addresses such leaves, including any restrictions on cancelling a LOA. Employment in a

learning pod is not governed by the just cause protection of a collective agreement so you will

need to assess the limits of job security and the limits of recourse should the learning pod be

cancelled or should the parents opt to cease involving you. Members should also consider the

impact of a LOA on benefits coverage and pension entitlements. Also, while you are on a LOA

you are still an employee of the board and, as such, continue to have a range of employment

and professional obligations.


Whether private learning pods are safe or not would depend on a range of factors. Unless your

employer in a private learning pod is governed by the Occupational Health Safety Act you

may have limited recourse if the working circumstances end up putting you at risk.


Members who become ill or injured through the course of delivering private instruction may not

be eligible for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board benefits if the employer is not covered by

workers compensation legislation. In addition, access to Long Term Disability ( benefits

may be impacted: for example, if you become ill during a leave of absence, benefits are

generally not payable for the planned duration of that absence. If your LTD coverage was

interrupted for a leave of absence, disability arising during that leave may prevent future claims

and coverage entirely.


Finally, there are other issues that members would be wise to contemplate prior to undertaking

any private instruction, including but not limited to: obligations related to student supervision,

insurance and liability considerations, obligations under the Education Act for operating a

private school, Ministry inspection and oversight, your statutory duties to report to the CAS job

security and any right or not to employment insurance benefits should the private employment

come to an end.


Additional Considerations

Both the OCT and the CECE have a number of publications that should be re viewed by

members. Some of these include:


It is possible that educators who have recently graduated may be considering this type of

employment in lieu of securing a position with a school board. An educator who is a member of

the OCT or CECE should still be aware of the relevant advisories issued by both Colleges.

Members who have recently retired are advised to consult with the Ontario Teachers’ Pension

Plan concerning any pension implications should they accept this type of employment.


Conclusion

Be aware that concerns have also been expressed about inequities that are likely to be

exacerbated by the withdrawal of students from schools to participate in private instruction.

Further, defending publicly funded education and advocating for social justice are priorities

identified and approved by the membership of ETFO.


Members considering employment to deliver private instruction should be mindful of the

cautions and considerations outlined above.


Additional Resources